Assignment 2: Discussion 2
In this assignment, you will use the article below to examine the linkage between Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Transformational Leadership. You will also analyze the impact of a leader’s emotional intelligence on transformational leadership. Lastly, you will identify and discuss three examples of positive emotions that impact transformational leadership.
Brown, F. W., & Moshavi, D. (2005). Transformational leadership and emotional intelligence: A potential pathway for an increased understanding of interpersonal influence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 867–871. doi: 10.1002/job.334
Click here to view article
Based on the article above and your research, in a minimum of 400 words, respond to the following points:
- Based on the Brown and Moshavi (2005) article, examine the linkage between Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Transformational Leadership.
- Analyze the impact of a leader’s emotional intelligence on transformational leadership.
- Identify and discuss three examples of positive emotions that impact transformational leadership.
Submission Details:
By the due date assigned, post your response to the appropriate Discussion Area. Through the end of the module, review and comment on at least two peers’ responses.
Write your initial response in 300–500 words. Your response should be thorough and address all components of the discussion question in detail, include citations of all sources, where needed, according to the APA Style, and demonstrate accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation
Do the following when responding to your peers:
- Read your peers’ answers.
- Provide substantive comments by
- contributing new, relevant information from course readings, Web sites, or other sources;
- building on the remarks or questions of others; or
- sharing practical examples of key concepts from your professional or personal experiences
- Respond to feedback on your posting and provide feedback to other students on their ideas.
- Make sure your writing
- is clear, concise, and organized;
- demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and
- displays accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
| Grading Table | Maximum Points |
Initial response was:
|
16 |
Discussion Response and Participation:
|
16 |
Writing:
|
8 |
| Total: |
40 |
| Grading Table | Maximum Points |
| Response Criteria | |
| Provided an in-depth explanation or analysis of subject or topic. |
8 |
| Used a clear, logical, and organized line of reasoning. |
4 |
| Provided adequate justification and evidence supporting the opinion expressed. |
4 |
| Submitted on time. |
4 |
| Participation Criteria | |
| Participated in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with rationale, challenging a point of discussion, or making a relationship between one or more points of the discussion. |
4 |
| Displayed consistent sensitivity when working with individuals from varied backgrounds. |
4 |
| Accessed one or more of the Argosy University’s online database collections and integrated findings from two to three peer-reviewed journal articles relating to the subject. |
4 |
| Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. |
4 |
| Responded to the posts of at least two classmates with meaningful and relevant responses that add value to the original post or the discussion. Offered criticism that was respectful of the other person’s feelings. |
All papers you get at Proficientwriter.com are meant for research purposes only. The papers are not supposed to be submitted for academic credit.
