Critical Appraisals of Evidence Assignment, two part assignment: table and paper

• Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
• Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tools document. Make certain that all of the following are included in this segment of the assignment:

• An evaluation table
• A levels of evidence table
• An outcomes synthesis table

• Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research
• Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

Part B, Written Paper

• Title Page
• Introductory paragraph – include the purpose of the paper. (HINT: Look at the outcomes assigned for this part of the assignment.)
• Using the table you created, write a one- two-page narrative summary of the articles under review.
• Write one paragraph describing the best practice you have identified from the evidence. (Hint: Be sure to tie it back to the evidence!)
• Write the conclusion paragraph – Summarize the key points of the paper!
• Reference Page – Use correct APA format – Review previous announcements, APA Manual and Walden Writing Center Support as guides.

Due Week Seven Assignment: To Prepare for the Critical Appraisals of Evidence Assignment, remember to:

• Review the resources and consider the importance of critically appraising research evidence.
• Reflect on four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3 (all from Module 2 or two from Module 2 and two from Module 3).
• Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tools document provided in the Resources section of the module.
• References:

  Melnyk, B. M., &
  Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare:
  A guide to best practice (4th ed.).Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  Parker, V., Giles, M., Graham, L.,
  Suthers, B., Watts, W., O’Brien, T. Searles, A. (2017). Avoiding inappropriate
  urinary catheter use and
  catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI): a pre-post control
  intervention study. BMC Health Services Research, (1), 1. Retrieved
  from https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12…

  Regagnin, D., da Silva Alves, D., Cavalheiro,
  M., Camargo, S., Marra, T., da Silva, V., & Edmond, M. (2016). Sustainability of a program for
  continuous reduction of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. AJIC:
  American Journal of Infection Control,44(6), 642–646. Retrieved
  from https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1016/j.a…

• Abulhasan,
  Y. B., Rachel, S. P., Chatillon-Angle, M.-O., Alabdulraheem, N., Schiller, I.,

  Dendukuri,
  N., … Frenette, C. (2018). Healthcare-associated infections in the neurological
  intensive care unit: Results of a 6-year surveillance study at a major tertiary
  care center. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 46(6), 656–662. Retrieved
  from https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1016/j.a…

• Dehghanrad,
  F., Nobakht-e-Ghalati, Z., Zand, F., Gholamzadeh, S., Ghorbani, M., &
  Rosenthal,

  V. (2019). Effect of instruction and
  implementation of a preventive urinary tract infection

  bundle on the incidence of catheter
  associated urinary tract infection in intensive care unit

  patients. Electronic Journal of
  General Medicine, 16(2), 1–9. Retrieved from https://doi-

  org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.29333/ejgm/94099